Ask A Question
 
Bluestar4662
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 33
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #1
150 'dead zones' counted in oceans U.N. report warns of nitrogen runoff killing fisheries

The number of oxygen-deprived 'dead zones' in the world's oceans has been increasing since the 1970s and is now nearly 150, threatening fisheries as well as humans who depend on fish, the U.N. Environment Program announced Monday in unveiling its first-ever Global Environment Outlook Year Book.

advertisement These 'dead zones' are caused by an excess of nitrogen from farm fertilizers, sewage and emissions from vehicles and factories. In what experts call a 'nitrogen cascade,' the chemical flows untreated into oceans and triggers the proliferation of plankton, which in turn depletes oxygen in the water.

While fish might flee this suffocation, slow moving, bottom-dwelling creatures like clams, lobsters and oysters are less able to escape.

'Humankind is engaged in a gigantic, global experiment as a result of the inefficient and often overuse of fertilizers, the discharge of untreated sewage and rising emissions from vehicles and factories,' program executive director Klaus Toepfer said in a statement accompanying the report.

From small to vast zones Toepfer noted that 146 dead zones — most in Europe and the U.S. East Coast — range from under a square mile to up to 45,000 square miles. 'Unless urgent action is taken to tackle the sources of the problem,' he said, 'it is likely to escalate rapidly.'

The most infamous zone is in the Gulf of Mexico, where the Mississippi River dumps fertilizer runoff from the Midwest.

Others have appeared off South America, China, Japan, southeast Australia and New Zealand, the program said.

Preventive measures The report was released in Jeju, South Korea, where governments from around the world are sending officials this week for a Global Ministerial Environment Forum.

The program noted preventive steps can be taken, citing these examples:

* European nations along the Rhine agreed to halve discharged nitrogen levels, reducing the discharge into the North Sea. * Planting new forests and grasslands will help soak up excess nitrogen, keeping it out of waterways. * Requiring vehicles to reduce nitrogen emissions. * Fostering alternative energy sources that are not based on burning fossil fuels. * Better sewage treatment would reduce nutrient discharges to coastal waters.

Global warming warning

'In some areas, this in turn could lead to a marked increase in the levels of run-off from rivers into the seas,' the U.N. program said. 'They calculate that dissolved oxygen levels in the northern Gulf of Mexico, triggered by an increased discharge from the Mississippi River basin of 20 percent and a climb in temperature of up to four degrees Centigrade, could fall by 30 to 60 percent.'

The U.N. report is online at www.unep.org/geo/yearbook.
The topic has been locked.
Sharkbait
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 30
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #2
Isn't this a good thing? More plankton = more food for whales = more whales.

I thought Greenpeace wanted more whales?
The topic has been locked.
julesruis
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 30
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #3
Greenpeace wants more political power and more money.

The whales are just a vehicle.
The topic has been locked.
Bronze Boarder
luckynate
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 41
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #4
you shouldn't comment on things you have no idea about
The topic has been locked.
cosmosgazer
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 34
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #5
you shouldn't comment on things you have no idea about, it makes you look foolish.
The topic has been locked.
klauss
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 29
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #6
Wrong! Greenpeace wants fewer humans.

Bob Kolker
The topic has been locked.
AngelinaLl
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 29
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #7
It is most assuredly NOT a good thing.

Dead zone. Dead zone. Dead zone.

Dead zones are caused by ALGAE blooming, dying, and in the decomposition oxygen is taken from the water, stressing or killing other life in the area.

Algae is not the same as the plankton for whale food.

The rest of the argumentation is too puerile to address.
The topic has been locked.
Fijomnhf
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 30
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #8
How long does it take on average after the bloom for the area to become oxygen saturated?

josh halpern
The topic has been locked.
Bluestar4662
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 33
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 8 Months ago #9
It depends on the area and the concentration of dissolved oxygen under normal conditions. To have a 'dead zone' you have to have a low-energy benthic circulation environment where there is a very slow replenishment of the bottom water by 'new' oxic water from somewhere else. The Mississippi River delta area is a good example: the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico usually lies pretty far offshore, and that's the major circulation feature in the Gulf. So dead plankton from the nearshore blooms basically settle right to the bottom and stay there, and the bacteria respire the organic matter and use up the oxygen quite efficiently (and the anoxic bacteria take over when the oxygen is gone). Since the influx of oxic water is so slow, the only way to reduce the severity of the problem is to reduce the input of organic matter to the benthos.

This Web page below is somewhat informative on this issue (I happen to know the author):
http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/oceancolor/dead_zones.shtml

Jim Acker
The topic has been locked.

Spread the Word!

Four out of five users would recommend us to a friend. Shouldn't you?
Link to Us    Tell a Friend

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 My Greenpeace Buddies