Ask A Question
 
ekcfrench
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 27
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #1
100 out of 700000+(?) minke, 50 out of 22000 bryde's whales, and 8 out of 102000 sperm whales. In which way is this a threat to either of those
The topic has been locked.
tialhoyes
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 25
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #2
So you, like Peter McCloskey, are a hypocrit and cannot demonstrate where there is a lack of science.

[more than 150 cites snipped for brevity]
The topic has been locked.
Dom
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 35
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #3
1) Whales are not people.

2) Any whale that finds it's way into the silverdome is safe from whalers.

1) Because it isn't wrong.

2) It isn't wrong because you say so.

3) You're still using racist slurs.
The topic has been locked.
fifngoopuiui
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 27
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #4
Whales are not humans. Humans need to eat. Whales are edible, just like carrots. I don't see you whining over carrots being killed by humans. Are carrots less valuable than humans?
The topic has been locked.
Gastrok
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 30
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #5
Who says they use tigers in the name of science? That's stupid.
The topic has been locked.
keck314
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 33
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #6
The hypocrisy is the continuation of commercial whaling under the guise of scientific research. Obviously, you would support a return to full scale commercial whaling. Although a horrendous prospect, at least that would be honest.
The topic has been locked.
BGIII
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 31
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 3 Months ago #7
You have not demonstrated that such a thing exists. But your argument that it is so _because_ the Japanese Science Project sells the whale meat _as required_ by the IWC rules, is the height of hypocrisy.

'Full scale commercial whaling' is ambiguous, and I most certainly would not support any definition that I'm familiar with. You clearly haven't got a clue.

In what way? First define you terms so that we have some idea what you are even talking about. Second, do not put words into my mouth as *I* will be the one to make statements about what I do or do not support.
The topic has been locked.

Spread the Word!

Four out of five users would recommend us to a friend. Shouldn't you?
Link to Us    Tell a Friend

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 My Greenpeace Buddies