My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Linda2
Senior Boarder
Posts: 73
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Disaster at sea: global warming hits UK birds By Michael McCarthy Environment Editor 30 July 2004

Hundreds of thousands of Scottish seabirds have failed to breed this summer in a wildlife catastrophe which is being linked by scientists directly to global warming.

The massive unprecedented collapse of nesting attempts by several seabird species in Orkney and Shetland is likely to prove the first major impact of climate change on Britain.

In what could be a sub-plot from the recent disaster movie, The Day After Tomorrow, a rise in sea temperature is believed to have led to the mysterious disappearance of a key part of the marine food chain - the sandeel, the small fish whose great teeming shoals have hitherto sustained larger fish, marine mammals and seabirds in their millions.

In Orkney and Shetland, the sandeel stocks have been shrinking for several years, and this summer they have disappeared: the result for seabirds has been mass starvation. The figures for breeding failure, for Shetland in particular, almost defy belief.

More than 172,000 breeding pairs of guillemots were recorded in the islands in the last national census, Seabird 2000, whose results were published this year; this summer the birds have produced almost no young, according to Peter Ellis, Shetland area manager for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSP.

Martin Heubeck of Aberdeen University, who has monitored Shetland seabirds for 30 years, said: 'The breeding failure of the guillemots is unprecedented in Europe.' More than 6,800 pairs of great skuas were recorded in Shetland in the same census; this year they have produced a handful of chicks - perhaps fewer than 10 - while the arctic skuas (1,120 pairs in the census) have failed to produce any surviving young.

The 24,000 pairs of arctic terns, and the 16,700 pairs of Shetland kittiwakes - small gulls - have 'probably suffered complete failure', said Mr Ellis.

In Orkney the picture is very similar, although detailed figures are not yet available. 'It looks very bad,' said the RSPB's warden on Orkney mainland, Andy Knight. 'Very few of the birds have raised any chicks at all.'

The counting and monitoring is still going on and the figures are by no means complete: it is likely that puffins, for example, will also have suffered massive breeding failure but because they nest deep in burrows, this is not immediately obvious.

But the astonishing scale of what has taken place is already clear - and the link to climate change is being openly made by scientists. It is believed that the microscopic plankton on which tiny sandeel larvae feed are moving northwards as the sea water warms, leaving the baby fish with nothing to feed on.

This is being seen in the North Sea in particular, where the water temperature has risen by 2C in the past 20 years, and where the whole ecosystem is thought to be undergoing a 'regime shift', or a fundamental alteration in the interaction of its component species. 'Think of the North Sea as an engine, and plankton as the fuel driving it,' said Euan Dunn of the RSPB, one of the world's leading experts on the interaction of fish and seabirds. 'The fuel mix has changed so radically in the past 20 years, as a result of climate change, that the whole engine is now spluttering and starting to malfunction. All of the animals in the food web above the plankton, first the sandeels, then the larger fish like cod, and ultimately the seabirds, are starting to be affected.'

Research last year clearly showed that the higher the temperature, the less sandeels could maintain their population level, said Dr Dunn. 'The young sandeels are simply not surviving.'

Although over-fishing of sandeels has caused breeding failures in the past, the present situation could not be blamed on fishing, he said. The Shetland sandeel fishery was catching so few fish that it was closed as a precautionary measure earlier this year. 'Climate change is a far more likely explanation.'

The spectacular seabird populations of the Northern Isles have a double importance. They are of great value scientifically, holding, for example, the world's biggest populations of great skuas. And they are of enormous value to Orkney and Shetland tourism, being the principal draw for many visitors. The national and international significance of what has happened is only just beginning to dawn on the wider political and scientific community, but some leading figures are already taking it on board.

'This is an incredible event,' said Tony Juniper, director of Friends of the Earth. 'The catastrophe [of these] seabirds is just a foretaste of what lies ahead.

'It shows that climate change is happening now, [with] devastating consequences here in Britain, and it shows that reducing the pollution causing changes to the earth's climate should now be the global number one political priority.'
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
nulleq
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
graphgraph
User Offline
 
THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING!! I guess 'global warming' is what drove the anchovies away from Monterrey bay back in the 30's also. The 'failure to breed' is supposed to be linked to fish they fed on not being in the same place anymore.

Now go back to 'liberating' Quebec, little scotti.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
nulleq
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
graphgraph
User Offline
 
OH MY GOD WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!! At a rate of 150 metres a year there is only TWELVE THOUSAND YEARS before it is all GONE!!!!

HOW WILL WE SURVIVE!!!

Maybe they can apply for a grant to determine that ice melts at 1 degree C. I'm sure it would be an historic acheivement.

NO!!!! The earth is a STATIC ENVIRONMENT and NOTHING EVER CHANGES!!! It is those EVIL PEOPLE!!

Really? I just bought a 10 pound bag and they don't appear to be hundreds of years old.

So much for your junk science.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
cosmic_notion
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Oh no, it's simply INCONCEIVABLE that 6 billion humans could have a significant effect on their environment.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
ekcfrench
Expert Boarder
Posts: 82
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Inuego: You keep saying that. I dunna think that word means what you think it means.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
FiLoFrAk
Expert Boarder
Posts: 80
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Yah. There should be a world government 'UN' commission on how many human beings are ALLOWED to be on the face of the earth. I'm sure the french will ALLOW U.S. citizens to remain alive.

But how about the other 178 nations? Do you think they will allow us to live? Or should a few million be slaughtered for the 'common
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
myprojeff
Senior Boarder
Posts: 77
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Is this a Straw Man approach or did you forget to take your Ritalin?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
AngelinaLl
Expert Boarder
Posts: 82
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Action is quite right. The human population must be limited. Either it will be done through rational thought, or be imposed upon us by the brutal dictates of simple arithmatic.

So far AmeriKKKa has murdered about 10 million for the 'common good.' Given Action's support for the murder of tens of thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq, I have little doubt that fed another lie or two, he would support the brutal murder of another 10 million people.

Particularly if they were poor and their skin was brown.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
cosmosgazer
Expert Boarder
Posts: 82
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I think that it is poorly applied, but hardly a strawman as much of the backing for the 'man cannot affect the environment' comes from those who dump hazardous waste in other countries and pollute the world for their own convenience.

However, a more applicable response would be to wonder about the intelligence of someone who cannot *conceive* of the reality around them. Is such blind ignorance an argument?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Dec 2008 My Green Peace Buddies