It failed to inform its readers with a core point.
They catch whales with a view of sustainable use, which is agreed on a international treaty, called International Convention For The Regulation Of Whaling. USA has also signed this treaty.
International Convention For The Regulation Of Whaling
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/iwcoffice/
Convention.htm
Under the treaty, their activities are totally legal. While USA's sanction is under suspicion of violating the international agreement.
Both of species are not endangered. Why USA has to threaten a foreign country with sanction to blockade a sustainable use?
Harsh seas become even more dangerous when they face activists, illegally obstructing them.
In the eyes of the law, anti-whaling countries action is under suspicion of violating the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) is an international law which sets requirements of international conventions and treaties. 2. International Convention For The Regulation Of Whaling (ICRW), which
all nations in IWC has ratified, is a International convention to regulate whaling with a view of sustainable use. 3. In IWC, anti-whaling countries is blockading the resume of whaling ,
even though credible scientific opinion supports the sustainable use of abundant whale resources.
In short, anti-whaling countries are violating VCLT by ignoring a international treaty (ICRW) which they also has ratified.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (If you dare to see .....)
http://www.unog.ch/archives/vienna/vien_69.htm
All countries are required to respect the international treaty they has ratified and work together on sustainable use of resources. Somehow, some want whales to be an exception for various mysterious reasons though.
Takayuki Kono