'Everywhere, except inside the minds of a few red state inbred morons, the cherry-picked climate science the Idso's website tried to sell has lost all its value.'
Revisionism at work. More 'science' co-opted by grants from the wi$e-users lobby to make their science say what Big Oil & the shrub wants it to say.
Gee, a denialist finally admits the models work.
When science gets in the way of your bias, reject the science?
Why should anyone care what you have to say on the subject of science, James. You've admitted you don't understand it. Until you do, perhaps you should stay out of the science newsgroups. Yo...
November 19, 2002
Ignorance is bliss, eh?
This is a science newsgroup.
Obviously you are not willing to do or read any science either.
I suggest you trim sci.environment off your heade...
That's where I've got you. Science is not a matter of who writes the most articles, wins. It is a matter of the accumulation of knowledge leading to explanation and prediction.
It matter...
Another icon of science bites the dust. Is that you Lloyd? Or are you the target of a well orchestrated disinformation campaign?
Newsgroups: sci.chem Subject: Re: Car exhaust cleanup question Date...
...A legitimate piece of what? News story? Doesn't count. Something from one of those sites you get your science from? Doesn't count. When do you think he might post some science? Better still,...
...9;Decadal Trend,' at the bottom of the file, is 0.074 K/Decade, which is .74 K/Century.
Cite real science, not CO2 science, supporting this statement, please. What makes drought when the clim...
It's a science.
Who says they use tigers in the name of science? That's stupid.
...d about before it becomes obvious that environmental considerations, people's health, and having a conscience interfere with profit maximization. Ask the forumer David Ball about profit, Ball wan...
Gonna bury you with science and facts... L.K.
...g.
Roger, maybe you disagree, but this sounds plausible to me. I mean, nobody who's serious about science would claim that every facet of global climate change would be equally bad.
Sever...
A quick check of 'ISI Web of Science' shows you are about 6 years out of date. There were dozens of successful detections of the AGW signal published about then.
Check out this BBC url, for more info about the 'problem'. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/science/nature/3253476.stm
...e you implying a conformity in the opinions of 'scientists'?
That would be the antithesis of science, would it not?
Watch me pull a rabbit out of your hat....
There will be no moderated news group. Use self-control to refrain from posting 'talk' to 'science' groups, and use your killfile if you're intolerant of dissent. Ponder this:...
...veral tens of whales per year?
Are whales highly intelligent? I guess she is just a believer of pseudo-science.
Also, it seems she is trying to introduce a human-centric hierarchy into animal ...
...l warming. We know what to do to correct it. We know what the results of misdirection, deception, fraud in science to divert us does.
Here are the Global Warming counterfacts (partial list):
*...
...ogle.news.com and look up the waves of tornados since [Date: 8 May 2003 21:49:49 -0700] and tell me why my science saw something I could predict and your science saw only chaos?
Explain why you sh...
Urban sprawl continues to be the major cause of deforestation and watershed destruction.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/
11oct_sprawl.htm?list84324
for information.
Cities engulf...
Global warming is definitely NOT a religious issue. It is an issue of pure science and the facts are not religious.
Cleaning up after ourselves, and taking responsibity for our waste, however, is ...
...dullard like you, Allen, that is high praise. When are you and I going to have a nice discussion about the science? I've repeatedly tried to engage you, but every time I do, you run for the hills...
... the years immediately before and after. Of this you can be certain. The trends can only be explained by a science that is still developing.
Let me rephrase your question and I will take a shot at...
...rue, and most unknown, are also equally unsupported by these two displays. This all sounds like the pseudo-science you'd find on this Idso's 'CO2Science' web site....
...t? so far there has been NO ONE in this news group who has made such an ridiculous, only you by way of
science that can not be experimented under 'controlled conditions' but we still man...
It is a 7-year-old book, http://www.addall.com/Browse/Detail/0306450836.html
, from a non-science publisher, http://www.dacapopress.com/about.htm
, who doesn't have a peer review proc...
...;s 2003 now, in case you haven't noticed.
Go to scientific journals and see what the consensus in science is.
You really are an idiot....
Yet another opinion on climate science from economists.
Argh.
Jim Acker
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Jim Acker
'Since we are assured that an...
The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its
Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 My Greenpeace Buddies