the Bush record

'This administration, in catering to industries that put America's health and natural heritage at risk, threatens to do more damage to our environmental protections than any other in U.S. history.

Here is NRDC's account of what the Bush administration has done and is doing on environmental matters. ' This administration, in catering to industries that put America's health and natural heritage at risk, threatens to do more damage to our environmental protections than any other in U.S. history.

Here is NRDC's account of what the Bush administration has done and is doing on environmental matters. ' [ Last Update: 3.18.2004 ]

Go check out the Democratic Underground and similar groups. With all the stuff that is coming out from people like Clark, it becomes more obvious every day that Bush ought to be impeached. He knew about 9/11.

It's not a record, it's a collection of links to their own agitprop. You want to see the real record, take a look at EPA data. Why is the air and water cleaner than it was in 1998?

<...>

DU has some of the most hateful and factually-errant posters on the internet. Lesley should feel right at home there.

Clarke. Do you mean his background briefing to reporters in 2002? His resignation letter? How about the errors in his book, like his remarks about Don Rumsfeld at a meeting a week before 9/11

<restore> http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/wildlife.asp

<heh> Because you -say- it is? ..

EPA Data On Water Purity Faulted By David Nakamura Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, March 12, 2004; Page B01

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has overstated the purity of the nation's drinking water in four recent years, potentially leaving millions of people at risk, according to a new report.

From 1999 through 2002, the EPA announced that it met its goal that 91 percent of U.S. residents have access to safe tap water. But the data the EPA used to make those conclusions were 'flawed and incomplete' because states did not report all violations to the federal agency, stated a report released this week by Kwai Chan, the EPA's assistant inspector general.

Despite that, the EPA trumpeted the inaccurate rates to the media, giving a false impression to the public, Chan said. The EPA's documents show that some agency officials believe that in 2002, only about 81 percent of the jurisdictions monitored had safe drinking water, far lower than the official agency estimate of 94 percent for that year. The lower number would put roughly 30 million additional people at potential risk. ...' http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename= article&node=&contentId=A51599-2004Mar11&notFound=true ( http://tinyurl.com/yqkvj ).

<..>

Lies and character assassination are hallmarks of Team Bush

'How else to explain the waffling, the stonewalling, the hiding behind executive privilege ..'

Haha. That's an opinion piece, not a news article. It's devoid of facts from the first sentence.

Note that the site peddles 9/11 conspiracy theory videos and also has bullshit on 'How LBJ Killed JFK.' Watch out for black helicopters, numbnuts.

<...>

Funny that liberals would screech about executive privilege after the Clinton administration. Anyway, why did this very same Richard Clarke fellow invoke it before the Senate in 1999?

<...>

Here's the link I was looking for, Chelsea:

Point proven.